Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
case legislation Case law is law that is based on judicial decisions instead than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case law concerns unique disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case law, also used interchangeably with common law , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or matter.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or Woman don't approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
The an abundance of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made apparent that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-subject duties while in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision of the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
However it can be made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain regard of your family lose in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been obtained. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. Read more
In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court while in the United States. Reduce courts to the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related for the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its very own judicial system here that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each individual state is frequently referred to given that the “supreme” court, While there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, although state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.
Because of this, simply citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this kind of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is probably going being more frustrating than it’s well worth.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that even though thinking of the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of all the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it appropriate into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on founded court precedents, as well as the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Problems or Errors If you encounter any technical problems with this website (like a terrible link or maybe a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Heart.
8. For your reasons stated above, this court finds the petition to become without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is Hence acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is just not thorough, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.